Direct Payment System in Sugarcane Industry: Beneficial or Unfavourable Solution?
Date
2022-02-28Author
HARWOTO, Wahyu Rizki
RONDHI, Mohammad
ROKHANI, Rokhani
SUWANDARI, Anik
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Smallholder Farmer (PR) dominate the sugarcane supply for national sugar production. That
indicates sugar production depends on the sustainability of sugarcane’s supply from smallholder
sugarcane farming. 34.4 percent of sugarcane farmers in Indonesia partner with sugarcane
factories, while others decide to manage independent farming. So far, the partnership is defined
by the Profit-sharing system (SBH). The number of independent farmers raises why farmers decide
independent farming rather than partnership. Otherwise, government through
593/TI.050/E/7/2019 propose a policy for sugarcane factories to obtain sugarcane with Direct
System. This situation raises the pros and cons at the farmer's level to decide it. A direct Payment
System (SPT) is a buy-sell transaction within farmers without sustainability. One of the sugar
factories performing SBH partnership is PG Kebon Agung, located in Malang with a vast
production capacity. This study aimed to describe the partnership and transaction mechanism,
determine the decision-making factors of farmers participating in SBH partnerships, and compare
the incomes. The analytical method is descriptive-qualitative, logistic regression analysis, and
comparative income analysis. The results showed that SBH has advantages in assisting farmers
but has weaknesses in payment times. This is the opposite of SPT, which provides faster payment
times. The amount of SBH farming income is also more significant than SPT. So this study
suggests that SBH farmers are suitable for farmers who have a shortage of capital. At the same
time, SPT is suitable for farmers with more capital who need a faster cash flow.
Collections
- LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen [7287]