dc.contributor.author | INDARTO, Indarto | |
dc.contributor.author | NOVITA, Elida | |
dc.contributor.author | WAHYUNINGSIH, Sri | |
dc.contributor.author | HERLINDA, Nur Defitri | |
dc.contributor.author | HIDAYAH, Entin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-20T16:58:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-20T16:58:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/99835 | |
dc.description.abstract | Baseflow is an important component affecting the availability of
water in the river during the dry season. Availability of water in the dry season
is useful for water resources management. This research aims to test and to
compare six recursive digital filters (RDF) methods for calculating baseflow
and baseflow index. This research was conducted in Brantas Watershed. Two
outlets (sub-watersheds) located at Kertosono and Ploso were used. Daily
discharge from 1996 to 2015 of the two outlets above was used as main input
for this study. While rainfall data were used to determine the calibration
period. The sequence procedures of this research, consist of: (1) inventory of
daily discharge and rainfall data, (2) data processing, (3) calibration, (4)
validation, and (5) evaluation of models’ performances. Six (6) methods of
baseflow separation based on recursive digital filters were evaluated. The
calibration process was carried out for periods 1996 to 2005. The periods
from July to September was assumed to be the peak of the dry season and then
selected for calibration process. The parameter values were calibrated using
the data from dry season for each year. Furthermore, the average value of
parameters obtained from calibration period then used to separate baseflow
in validation process (periods 2006 to 2015). The result of separation both in
calibration and validation are then evaluated using root mean square error
(RMSE), coefficient of determination (R²) and FDC. This research shows that
the Lyne-Hollick and EWMA filters perform better than other methods. In
Brantas Kertosono sub-watershed, the optimal parameter value for Lyne
Hollick algoritmh (α
ly
) = 0.995 dan for EWMA filter (α
ew
) = 0.003 and in
Brantas Ploso sub-watershed (α
ly
) = 0.99 dan (α
ew
) = 0.003. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | Ind | en_US |
dc.publisher | Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan 9(3): 626-640 | en_US |
dc.subject | Baseflow | en_US |
dc.subject | separation | en_US |
dc.subject | digital filter | en_US |
dc.subject | Brantas | en_US |
dc.title | Aplikasi Metode untuk Pemisahan Aliran Dasar Berbasis Filter Digital: Studi di Wilayah DAS Brantas (Application of Recursive Digital Filter (RDF) Methods for Baseflow Separation: Study at Brantas Watershed) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI1710201#Teknik Pertanian | |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | kodeprodi1910301#Teknik Sipil | |
dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0001017022 | |
dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0030117302 | |
dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0030117204 | |
dc.identifier.nidn | NIDN0015126606 | |