Collaborative Learning and Caring Community in Mathematics Learning by using Student’s Worksheet Based on Scientific Approach
Date
2018-11-24Author
HOBRI, Hobri
MURTIKUSUMA, Randi Pratama
SUSANTO, Susanto
SUHARTO, Suharto
OKTAVIANINGTYAS, Ervin
PUTRI, Inge Wiliandani Setya
KRISNAWATI, Tatik
FAUSI, Ahmad
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Mathematics teaching and learning process will be efficient and effective if it is
supported by high quality of materials learning, especially Student’s Worksheet (SW).
Student’s worksheet of Mathematics in Curriculum 2013 must possess 5 phases, in which they
are observing, questioning, exploring, associating, and communicating. This research was
intended to describe caring community on numbers material through student’s worksheet that
based on scientific approach at SMPN 1 Situbondo. In this research, the data were analyzed by
qualitative research. The data were collected through observation and interview. The results of
this research can be summed up into, (1) the quality of interaction between students in a group
was good, the high-level student gave some scaffoldings to junior high school students, and
they gave some scaffoldings to lower-level students, but the interaction between high-level
student and lower-level student was not so good, (2) the activity in the solving the questions on
worksheet was considered well. In observation phase, all students observed problem and task
one by one and discuss edit together about how to determine
𝑎
𝑚
𝑎
𝑛
, and its application. In
questioning phase, some students within several groups asked and discussed the process and
the result of
𝑎
𝑚
𝑎
𝑛
, but there were several students who just observed and copied the problems.
During associating phase, some students communicated their idea of how to simplify
𝑎
𝑚
𝑎
𝑛
to
𝑎
𝑚 −𝑛
through oral discussion and doing the SW, the other one showed another way, and the
others wrote on their SW. In associating phase, all students solved problems and tasks, but they
found several wrong, thus, some students said that their answers were wrong, asked the
students in their group and discussed the others’ explanations about the meaning of
𝑎
𝑚
𝑎
𝑛
, if
𝑚 = 𝑛, 𝑚 < 𝑛 and 𝑚 > 𝑛. The last, in communicating phase, one of students in group
explained the conclusion of
𝑎
𝑚
𝑎
𝑛
and its application, and if the teacher asked him about his
explanation, the other students in his group would answer it. It can be concluded that the
quality of interaction and caring community on mathematics teaching and learning process was
good.
Collections
- LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen [7300]