dc.contributor.author | Moelyaningrum, Anita Dewi | |
dc.contributor.author | Molassy, Honest Dody | |
dc.contributor.author | Setyowati, Intan Kartika | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-08T06:59:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-08T06:59:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11-14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/96982 | |
dc.description | The 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology
8 December 2018, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The Robusta coffee plantation were founded from Silo Jember district Indonesia. One
of the solid waste coffee plantation is coffee bark. The objective of this study is to find the
formulation of Robusta coffee bark Jember for charcoal briquette as alternative energy. The
formulation of charcoal robusta coffee bark were comparisson within organic starch adhesive
and anorganic adhesive. The formulation were analyzed in physical and chemical quality base
on SNI Number. 01-6235-2000. the solid waste coffee plantation were collected from
smallholders coffee plantation on Silo Jember. The first step were drying the solid waste coffee
bark in the sun almost 2 days till dried. Then, the dried coffee bark were using pod waste
pyrolysis in reactor with a temperature of 400 C until became charcoal. Organic starch adhesive
were making by mixing the the 6 gram starch and 60 milliliter water (ratio 1:10), and then mixing
down with 60 gram charcoa (formula 1). Formula 2 were mixing the 60 gram charcoal, organic
starch adhesive and added 3 gram anorganic adhesive. The briquettes were formed into tube with
diameter 6 cm and the thickness 4 cm. The result showed that using organic starch adhesive were
more fragile, harder to light the fire first but dried faster than using anorganic adhesive. The
chemical analysis on the formula 1 (briquette with organic starch adhesive) and formula 2
(briquette with anorganic adhesive) showed that moisture were 9,87% ; 7,7 %, volatil matter
were 5,87%; 4,2 %, the Ash content were 8,01 % ; 5,03 %, the caloric value were 4870 cal/gr;
7233 cal/ gr and the fixed carbon were 65%; 81%. The formula 2 showed the better quality than
formula 1. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | IOP Publishing: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1363 (2019) 012091 | en_US |
dc.subject | formulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Robusta coffee bark Jember | en_US |
dc.subject | charcoal Briquettes | en_US |
dc.subject | alternative energy | en_US |
dc.subject | organic starch adhesive | en_US |
dc.subject | anorganic adhesive | en_US |
dc.subject | INDONESIA | en_US |
dc.title | The Formulation Robusta Coffee Bark Jember Indonesia for Charcoal Briquettes as Alternative Energy : The Comparison Organic Starch Adhesive and Anorganic Adhesive | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI2110101#Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat | |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI0910101#Hubungan Internasional | |
dc.identifier.kodeprodi | KODEPRODI1510601#Agribisnis | |