• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • LECTURER SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION (Publikasi Ilmiah)
    • LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • LECTURER SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION (Publikasi Ilmiah)
    • LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Performance comparison analysis library communication cluster system using merge sort

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    F. IK_Jurnal_Diah Ayu R_Performance comparison analysis library.pdf (4.509Mb)
    Date
    2018-11-29
    Author
    Wulandari, Diah Ayu Retnani
    Ramadhan, Mochamad Edoward
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Begins by using a single processor, to increase the speed of computing time, the use of multi-processor was introduced. The second paradigm is known as parallel computing, example cluster. The cluster must have the communication potocol for processing, one of it is message passing Interface (MPI). MPI have many library, both of them OPENMPI and MPICH2. Performance of the cluster machine depend on suitable between performance characters of library communication and characters of the problem so this study aims to analyze the comparative performances libraries in handling parallel computing process. The case study in this research are MPICH2 and OpenMPI. This case research execute sorting’s problem to know the performance of cluster system. The sorting problem use mergesort method. The research method is by implementing OpenMPI and MPICH2 on a Linux-based cluster by using five computer virtual then analyze the performance of the system by different scenario tests and three parameters for to know the performance of MPICH2 and OpenMPI. These performances are execution time, speedup and efficiency. The results of this study showed that the addition of each data size makes OpenMPI and MPICH2 have an average speed-up and efficiency tend to increase but at a large data size decreases. increased data size doesn't necessarily increased speed up and efficiency but only execution time example in 100000 data size. OpenMPI has a execution time greater than MPICH2 example in 1000 data size average execution time with MPICH2 is 0,009721 and OpenMPI is 0,003895 OpenMPI can customize communication needs.
    URI
    http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/88597
    Collections
    • LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen [7377]

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository