| dc.description.abstract | The Act number 2 of 2004 on Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement was established as a legal means for
resolving the increasing and complex industrial relations dispute. It is hoped that the issuance of the Industrial
Relations Dispute Settlement law will be able to realize a fast, fair and inexpensive institution and mechanism of
dispute settlement of industrial relations. However, due to the consideration and objective of protecting labor
rights, research has been conducted on the law through multiple approaches, namely legislation approach,
concept approach and case approach. The results showed that in the The Act number 2 of 2004 on Industrial
Relations Dispute Settlement there found legal inconsistency concerning industrial relations mediation, in the
case of confusion between mediation and conciliation, the single authority of mediator conducted by employees
of the Office of Manpower of Government as a representation of government, mediation is no longer as an
alternative media, mediators exceed the standard portion, the inadequacy of the requirements to mediate, the
conflict of norms to excessive government intervention and contrary to the nature of mediation of industrial
relations itself. | en_US |
