Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJAUHANI, Muhammad Afiful
dc.contributor.authorNUGRAHENI, Ninis
dc.contributor.authorZAMRONI, Mohammad
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-01T06:58:23Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01T06:58:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-01
dc.identifier.govdocKODEPRODI2010101#Pendidikan Dokter
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/111026
dc.description.abstractIn medical dispute resolution through mediation, a mediator with the medical qualification will be easier to facilitate the mediation process because of their expertise related to substance, but health workers which have high solidity towards the profession which will make it difficult for them to be impartial. Theprincipalaimofthisthesiswastostudythedoctor’scapabilityanddoctor’simpartialityas a mediator in medical disputes. The issue will be discussed normatively juridically through the statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach with Malaysia, Australia, and Netherland as the comparative country. Fromthisresearch,itcanbeconcludedthatthecapabilityofdoctorsasmediatorsofmedical disputes lies in the gravity levels of doctors who are commensurate with the context of the dispute.Malaysia,Australia,andtheNetherlandshaverequiredthatmediatorsneedtohave an understanding of the substance and have technical knowledge of theproblem at hand.A doctor’s impartiality as a mediator in medical disputes will have a tendency of partisanship and conflicts of interest.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.publisherSOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatanen_US
dc.subjectCapabilityen_US
dc.subjectImpartialityen_US
dc.subjectDoctoren_US
dc.subjectMediatoren_US
dc.subjectMedical Disputeen_US
dc.titleCapability Versus Imparsiality Of Doctors As Medical Disputes Mediatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record