Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEFENDI, Aan
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-11T04:10:56Z
dc.date.available2022-07-11T04:10:56Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.govdocKodeprodi#0710101#IlmuHukum
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/108280
dc.description.abstractThe decision of the Supreme Court interprets the meaning of abuse of power in a corruption delict Article 3 of Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption is the same as the meaning of abusing the power in Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning the Administrative Court resolves the problem of law enforcement in corruption cases but raises problems in the legal theories. The two laws are not related to the same subject so the concept of abusing the power cannot be used in the two laws simultaneously. Depenalization of the element of abusing power from corruption delict to create legal certainty that abusing the power is part of administrative law so that the settlement procedure also uses administrative law tools instead of criminal law (corruption delict).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Creative Research and Studiesen_US
dc.subjectdepenalizationen_US
dc.subjectabuse of poweren_US
dc.subjectlegal certaintyen_US
dc.titleDepenalization Elements of Abuse of Power From Corruption Delicten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record