• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UNDERGRADUATE THESES (Koleksi Skripsi Sarjana)
    • UT-Faculty of Law
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UNDERGRADUATE THESES (Koleksi Skripsi Sarjana)
    • UT-Faculty of Law
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Tinjauan Yuridis Perkosaan dalam Rumah Tangga (Putusan Nomor 899/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Dps)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERKOSAAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA_NAILIY KHARISATUL UMAMI.pdf (751.8Kb)
    Date
    2022-03-16
    Author
    UMAMI, Nailiy Kharisatul
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Sexual violence against wives that occurs in the household is better known by the general public as marital rape which is defined as rape that occurs in a marriage bond. However, a broader understanding understood by various groups regarding marital rape is a wife who receives acts of sexual violence by her husband or coercion by all against her wife to carry out sexual activities without considering the condition of the wife. Or forcing to have sexual relations in ways that are not fair or do not like the wife. In Indonesia, there have been several court decisions regarding the issue of sexual violence in the household, one of which is Decision Number 899/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Dps which was carried out by Tohari. The panel of judges in deciding this case using Article 46 of Law no. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence The judge's considerations are in accordance with the legal facts that have been proven by the public prosecutor that the defendant intentionally committed an act of domestic violence that caused physical injury to the victim's body and genitals. And the elements have been fulfilled, namely the element of every person and the element of committing acts of sexual violence. Of the aggravating and mitigating factors, one of the aggravating factors was that the defendant had hurt and injured the victim's witness who was the defendant's wife and the defendant did not feel guilty about what he had done. While mitigating factors are the defendant has never been convicted and the defendant is elderly. Therefore, based on the facts and legal considerations, the panel of judges sentenced the defendant to 5 (five) months in prison from the original demand of 10 (ten) months from the public prosecutor.
    URI
    http://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/107086
    Collections
    • UT-Faculty of Law [6321]

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Context

    Edit this item

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository