• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • LECTURER SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION (Publikasi Ilmiah)
    • LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • LECTURER SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION (Publikasi Ilmiah)
    • LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Characteristic of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS for Brushless DC Motor Controller: An Evaluation by Dynamic Test

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    FT_JURNAL_WIDJANARKO_Characteristic of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS for Brushless DC.pdf (1.353Mb)
    Date
    2021-06-01
    Author
    WIDJONARKO, Widjonarko
    SETIAWAN, Andi
    RUSDIYANTO, Bayu
    UTOMO, Satryo Budi
    SETIYO, Muji Muji
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Brushless DC (BLDC) motors are the most popular motors used by the industry because they are easy to control. BLDC motors are generally controlled by artificial controls such as Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). However, the performance of the BLDC control system in previous studies was compared separately with their respective parameters, making it difficult to evaluate comprehensively. Therefore, in order to investigate the characteristic performance of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS, this article provides a comparison of these artificial controls. Two scenarios of the dynamic tests are conducted to investigate control performance under constant torque-various speed and constant speed-various torque. By dynamic testing, characteristics of Fuzzy, ANN, and ANFIS can be observed as real applications. The testing parameters are: Settling Time, Overshoot and Overdamp (in the graph and average value), and then statistic performance are: Integral Square Error (ISE), Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral Time Absolute Error (ITAE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The test result in scenario 1 showed that the ANN has a better performance compared to other controllers with the MAE, IAE, ITAE, and ISE value of 31.3003; 105.6280; 208.0630; and 5,7289 e4, respectively. However, in scenario 2, ANN only has a better performance compared to other controllers on just a few parameters. In scenario 2, ANN is indeed able to maintain speed but it has a more ripple value than ANFIS. Even so, the ripple that occurs in ANN does not have too much value compared to the setpoint. Therefore, the MAE value of the ANN is smaller than the ANFIS (18.8937 of ANN and 28.4685 of ANFIS).
    URI
    http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/105261
    Collections
    • LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen [7377]

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository