Capitalism, Climate, and Commitment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesia’s Green Economy Agenda
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
fakultas ilmu budaya
Abstract
This research critically examines Indonesia’s green economy agenda through
the
lens of discourse, focusing on the speech delivered by Hashim
Djojohadikusumo at the Opening Ceremony of the Indonesia Pavilion at COP29.
Using Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) model—
comprising textual, discursive, and sociocultural dimensions—alongside John
Searle’s Speech Act Theory and Jason W. Moore’s Capitalocene framework, the
study investigates how environmental commitments are represented, legitimized,
and politicized in elite-level state communication.
The textual analysis reveals a dominance of commissive and assertive speech
acts, reflecting a strategic projection of commitment and credibility, often framed
through vague or euphemistic language. The discursive practice analysis highlights
the use of intertextual references (e.g., global treaties, crises, scientific authority) to
construct legitimacy while balancing international expectations and domestic
interests. The speech performs a dual narrative—both aligning with global climate
norms and defending sovereignty-driven development agendas.
At the sociocultural level, the research employs Fairclough’s Four-Stage
Dialectical-Relational Approach and Moore’s Capitalocene critique to uncover
deeper ideological functions of the discourse. The findings show that the speech
reinforces capitalist ecological governance by presenting climate action as
compatible with extractive development and market-based solutions, while
avoiding structural critique. The study identifies a clear shift from technocratic
environmental governance toward elite-driven, personalized diplomacy, signaling
what may be described as the death of technocratism in favor of oligarchic populism.
Overall, the research reveals that Indonesia’s green economy discourse, as
performed at COP29, serves more as a tool of symbolic statecraft and international
image management than as a platform for transformative ecological governance.
Description
Reupload file repository 4 februari 2026_agus/feren
