| dc.description.abstract | This Classroom Action Research was intended to improve the eleventh grade
students’ conditional sentence mastery through jigsaw at SMA Negeri 2 Bondowoso
in the 2011/2012 academic year. The research subjects were the students of class XI
IPA 1 that were determined purposively by consulting to the eleventh grade English
teacher.  Based  on  the  information  from the  teacher, this  class  had  the  lowest  mean
score of the English lesson among the other existing classes. However, the structure
diagnostic test was  given  to  the  research  subjects  to  know  their  ability  of  structure,
especially conditional  sentence  type  2 and  type  3. The  result  showed  that the  mean
score of the students’ diagnostic test was only 69.2 (fair category).
This classroom action research was done in two cycles in which each  cycle
covered four stages of  activities,  namely planning the  action;  implementing  the
action;  observing  and  evaluating;  and  analyzing  the  data  and  reflecting  the  action.
Each  cycle  was  conducted  in  two  meetings.  The  data  about  the  students’ structure
achievement were collected by administering the structure test after the actions given.
Observation  was  used  to  monitor the  process  of  teaching  structure through jigsaw
technique and the students’ participation in the classroom. The supporting data were
collected by interview and documentation.
In cycle I, the results of the structure test showed that the mean score of the
students’ achievement test was 74.1 (good category). Then, there was only 55.6% of
the total students could achieve the target score, that was at least 75. In other words,
the  percentage  of  the  students’  structure  achievement  that  got  score  at  least  75 was below 75%. Then, based on the classroom observation it was revealed that there were
two  indicators  that had  not  been  fulfilled.  Only  47.2%  of  the  students  raised  their
hands  when  the  teacher  gave  oral  questions  and 72.2%  of  the  students  did  the
instruction  given  by  the  teacher.  It  means  that  the  result  of  the  observation  had  not
achieved the requirement of the research, that was at least 75% of the students did at
least four from five indicators being observed. It showed that this research result had
not fulfilled the criteria of the success of the action. Therefore, the actions in cycle II
were  conducted in order  to  improve  the  students’ conditional  sentence mastery
through jigsaw technique.
The actions were continued to the second cycle by revising some necessary
aspects. The  English  teacher  and  the  researcher  collaborated  in  determining  the
members of the home groups. The students were equally grouped based on the result
of  the  structure  test  in  cycle  I  and  the  observation  done  by  the  observer  during  the
actions in cycle 1. Besides, the revision was dealing with the students’ opportunities
in  the  discussion,  the  teacher motivated the  quiet  or  lazy  students.  The  teacher  also
gave  more  attention  to  the  group  in  which the  members  didn’t  get  the  same
opportunities  in  the  discussion.  The  teacher  also  gave  more  explanation about  the
material  and  gave  chance  to  the  students  to  ask  questions  whether  or  not  they  had
understood  the  materials. It was  hoped  that  the  revision could  make  the  students
improve their conditional sentence mastery.
In  the  second  cycle,  the  results  of  structure  test  showed improvement.  The
mean  score  of  the  students’  structure  achievement  test  was  78.2 (good  category).  It
was  higher  than  the  mean  score  in  cycle  I, that  was 74.1.  Then,  there  was
improvement of the students who could achieve the target score required, that was at
least 75. There were 28 students or 77.8% of the total students got scores at least 75.
Regarding  the  students’  active  participation  in the teaching  learning  process  of
structure,  it  also  improved.  The  result  of  the  observation  had  achieved  the
requirement  of  the  research, that  was  at  least  75%  of  the  students  did at  least  four from  five indicators being  observed. These  results  indicated  that  this  research  had
fulfilled the criteria of the success of this action research.
Based  on  the  results,  it  could  be  concluded  that the teaching  of  structure
through jigsaw technique could improve the students’ conditional sentence mastery as
well as their active participation in the process of structure teaching learning. Then, it
is  suggested that the  English  teachers  to  use jigsaw as a technique in  teaching
structure since it could make the students participate actively in the teaching learning
process of structure and improve their structure achievement on conditional sentence. | en_US |