• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UNDERGRADUATE THESES (Koleksi Skripsi Sarjana)
    • UT-Faculty of Culture (Cultural Knowledge)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UNDERGRADUATE THESES (Koleksi Skripsi Sarjana)
    • UT-Faculty of Culture (Cultural Knowledge)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    THE SYMBOLS IN ERNEST HEMINGWAY’S FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    SKRIPSI (RIZKA FRIDAYANTI_050110101084)_1.pdf (162.2Kb)
    Date
    2013-12-04
    Author
    Rizka Fridayanti
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    For Whom the Bell Tolls is a novel written by Ernest Hemingway. It was published in 1940. It tells the story of Robert Jordan, a young American in the International Brigades attaches to a republican guerilla unit during the Spanish Civil War. As an expert in the use of bombs, he is assigned to blow up a bridge during an attack on the city of Segovia. Symbols are words that suggest much more than they mean on the surface and are necessary to help us express some ideas. Then, a symbol is a word or phrase or image that stands for large ideas. Not only are we capable of forming concepts for which there are no physical object to point to, but it is also possible for us to have moods, feeling for which we do not even have practice words. That is where symbols come in. Therefore, it is very interesting to analyze the topic of the Symbols in Ernest Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell tolls. This thesis wants to discuss the bridge as connector, the bridge as the symbol of rebellion, the bridge as the symbol of power, Pablo as a Fox, Maria and Republican as Rabbit. The approach to use in this discussion is symbolism approach by Carpenter. It is used to know the meaning of the symbols. The research methodology used in this thesis is inductive method. It analyzes the specific actions, events, or attitudes in the novel related to the problem discussed then draws conclusion. The results of the discussions show that firstly to describe the symbol of a rabbit, secondly is to describe the symbol of a fox and thirdly is to describe the symbol of the bridge. The analysis of this thesis proves that everything is neutral. However, every person has different meaning of a symbol. Some people think that a thing is not important for them but others think that it is very important for their life. For the Fascist, the bridge has an important thing and as the symbol of power, while for the Republican, bridge is the symbol of rebellion and as an important thing for their future.
    URI
    http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/3461
    Collections
    • UT-Faculty of Culture (Cultural Knowledge) [2307]

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Context

    Edit this item

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository