Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNI'MAH, Safifin
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T03:26:45Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T03:26:45Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-08
dc.identifier.nim180210401006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/122775
dc.description.abstractThis study observed how English teachers use rewards and punishments in the classroom using the descriptive qualitative method and classroom observations. Two XII grade English teachers were observed and the data gained were analyzed using Miles and Huberman's (2014) proposed data analysis. The findings have demonstrated that the teachers under observation employed a total of three types of rewards: fun activities, social reinforcement, and intrinsic reinforcement. Social reinforcement was the most common reward used by the teacher, accounting for over 50% of the 39 types. Punishments employed by teachers included symbolic, teacher-based, curtailment activity, and home-linked. Teachers used punishment and rewards for motivation and feedback. The teacher mainly used this component, employing over half of the 46 aspects for award administration, and implemented all punishment elements, such as warnings and prevention avoidance. Teachers often used all 11 punishment features.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikanen_US
dc.subjectrewardsen_US
dc.subjectpunishmentsen_US
dc.titleThe Implementation of Rewards and Punishment in the Efl Teaching at Vocational High Schoolen_US
dc.typeSkripsien_US
dc.identifier.prodipendidikan bahasa inggrisen_US
dc.identifier.pembimbing1Drs. Bambang Arya Wija Putra Dip.Ed., Ph.Den_US
dc.identifier.pembimbing2Areta Puspa S. Pd., M.Pd.en_US
dc.identifier.validatorrevaen_US
dc.identifier.finalization0a67b73d_2024_07_tanggal 10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record