Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWuryaningrum, Rusdhianti
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-06T01:37:18Z
dc.date.available2020-03-06T01:37:18Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/97318
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to describe the application through the Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) model on insurance advertising and its effectiveness in argumentative writing learning. The research method is a mixing qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative methods are applied by using the Fairclough's CDA model that applies micro, meso, and macro dimensions. Quantitative methods are used to measure the effectiveness of Fairclough CDA model on argumentative writing learning. The results showed the use of language, connectivity, and hegemony with future concerns caused by lifestyle and social demands, and calamity with phrases as a form of the claim that needs to be made a counterclaim. This strongly supports the argumentation content. The Mann Whitney U test shows significance value of 0,000 is ≤0.005. Thus, it can be concluded that Fairclough CDA model application of learning with CDA is effective for improving learning outcomes in argumentative writing.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, Volume 13, No. 1, February 2020, pp. 11–21en_US
dc.subjectargumentationen_US
dc.subjectwritingen_US
dc.subjectCritical Discourse Analysis (CDA)en_US
dc.subjectadvertisementen_US
dc.titleThe Effectiveness of the Implementation of Critical Discourse Analysis Insurance Advertising in Argumentative Writing Learning for University Studentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI0210402#Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0006057808


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record