dc.description.abstract | Since 2005, political polling and the application of polls-based candidacy have been
enormousl
y influential and, in fact, have become vital for local leader elections
(Pilkada(( ), particularly in Indonesia’s districts and municipalities. The Golkar Party’s
declaration that it was moving to polls-based candidacy created a domino effect,
inducing other major political parties—such as the National Mandate Party (Partai
Amanat Nasional, PAN), the Democratic Part
y (Partai Demokrat, PD), and the Indonesian
Democratic Party
of Struggle (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan,
PDIP)—to
follow Golkar’s approach to contestin
g
local constituencies. As polling
becomes
a new device for reforming
the political recruitment process, political polling
exercises have also unintendedly
transformed into a means for waging a power
stru
ggle.
Political actors have exploited polling
as a tool for gaining
a political
vehicle,
as a map for soliciting
bribes, as a map for guiding
the mobilization of votes,
and
as a means for invitin
g
an indirect bandwagon
effect. In short, political polling
has
moved beyond
acting as a tracker of voters’ preferences to become a popular
political
device. | en_US |