| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to discuss the existing contentious recall policy that becomes the legitimate reason to
replace or retire the House member proposed by political parties. The discussion also examines to what
extent recall, in practice, whether it enables the promotion of Indonesia's anti-corruption agenda. Through
the recall, political parties can withdraw their members in the House, either in the form of dismissal or
changing positions before the end of the term of office of members who sit in the House of representatives.
This study finds that the existing recall policy impedes democracy and negates how to eradicate
corruption in Indonesia. As a result, the current policy needs an option to ensure that recall will work as
it is expected. Therefore, this alternative should include constituents to propose recall, which will disrupt
the existing parties' domination, resulted in a more participatory system, and it reflects the more reciprocal
ways to link people, parties, and the House in Indonesian politics. The judiciary's role is another essential
aspect to highlight, in which the process and settlement of the recall may involve the Constitutional Court
as the hub of the political and constitutional settlement | en_US |
