• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UNDERGRADUATE THESES (Koleksi Skripsi Sarjana)
    • UT-Faculty of Dentistry
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UNDERGRADUATE THESES (Koleksi Skripsi Sarjana)
    • UT-Faculty of Dentistry
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    PERBEDAAN PENGUKURAN LEBAR MESIODISTAL GIGI KANINUS DAN PREMOLAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE RADIOGRAFI, SITEPU DAN MOYERS DI KLINIK ORTODONSIA RSGM UNIVERSITAS JEMBER

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Iriana Fitiariski - 091610101067_01.pdf (308.9Kb)
    Date
    2013-12-02
    Author
    Iriana Fitiariski
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Age 7-9 years is a mixed dentition that is susceptible to malocclusion. mild malocclusion can be removed and severe malocclusion can be prevented by interseptiv treatment. Determining the kinds of treatment requires the measurement models discrepancy include available space and required space. Many methods can be performed to determine the size of the canines and unerupted teeth premolar in determining the required space. Therefore it is alleged that there are differences in measurement of mesiodistal width of canine and premolars using radiography, Sitepu and Moyers method. The research was an observational analytic. The research was conducted on the study models and X-ray photo of patients of Ortodonsia clinic RSGM Jember University in September 2012 that fulfil the criterias. Measurement of the width of canines and unerupted premolars used radiographic method performed with radiographic comparison formula. Measurement used Sitepu and Moyers methods performed by calculating the width of four permanent mandibular incisors and projected in to Sitepu and Moyers prediction tables. Data were analyzed by ANOVA test followed by LSD test. The results showed significant differences (p <0.05) measurement of mesiodistal width of canine and premolars between radiographic and Sitepu method and between radiographic and Moyers method to the upper jaw. In mandible, measurement of mesiodistal width of canine and premolars between radiographic and Sitepu methods didn’t show significant differences (p> 0.05) and between radiographic and Moyers methods showed significant difference (p <0.05). There are differences in the results of measurements of mesiodistal width of canine and premolar using radiographic, Sitepu and Moyers methods on each jaw. The most accurate method is Sitepu method..
    URI
    http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/2126
    Collections
    • UT-Faculty of Dentistry [2124]

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Context

    Edit this item

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository