• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • MASTER THESES (Koleksi Tesis)
    • MT-Linguistic
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • MASTER THESES (Koleksi Tesis)
    • MT-Linguistic
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The English Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback on the Students’ Writings in Vocational High School

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Firyaal Mujahidah - 160210401034.pdf-.pdf (1.606Mb)
    Date
    2020-12-15
    Author
    MUJAHIDAH, Firyaal
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Writing has become one of the fundamental skills that must be mastered by the students. There are many strategies to overcome the students’ problems in writing a text. The use of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) may become one of the strategies to overcome the students’ problems in writing. Teacher’s WCF, namely comments, questions, or error correction given by the teacher in the written form on students’ assignment (Mack, 2009). There are eight types of Teacher’s WCF proposed by Ellis (2008). Those types are: (1) Direct WCF, (2) Indirect WCF, (3) Metalinguistic WCF by Using Error Codes, (4) Metalinguistic WCF by Using Explanation, (5) Focused WCF, (6) Unfocused WCF, (7) Electronic Feedback, (8) Reformulation. This study investigated the types of Teacher’s WCF given by the English teacher to the students’ writing along with the most frequent type of feedback given, the reason of the teacher in applying certain types of WCF, and the contribution of the WCF given by the English teacher for the students. This study used case study as the research design. The data were obtained from documentation and interview. The researcher copied the students’ writing which has received WCF from the teacher and categorized the types of written feedback by using the theory of typology of WCF from Ellis (2008). Then, the researcher did the interview with the English teacher in order to know the reason of the teacher in applying certain types of WCF to the students’ writings. After that, the researcher did interview with the students in order to know the contribution of WCF given by the English teacher. The interview used Indonesian language and was transcribed into English. The results of the interview were analyzed by using thematic analysis proposed by Braun and Clarke (2006). The results of the documentation revealed that the teacher used three types of WCF to the students’ writings. They were Direct WCF, Unfocused WCF, and Electronic Feedback. In addition, Direct WCF was the most frequent type of WCF given to the students’ writings. Based on the results of the interview, the teacher stated that she gave Direct WCF to the students’ writings because this type of WCF was understandable by the students. In providing Direct WCF, the teacher pointed out the students’ errors and directly provided the correct form of the errors. So, the students would not confuse to understand their mistakes that they have made on their writings and revised it. The second type of WCF given by the teacher is Unfocused WCF. The teacher gave correction to all the students’ errors rather than focusing on just one or two types of errors because she wanted to make the students understand about all their errors that they have made although it was time consuming. The teacher also gave Electronic feedback to the students by giving the comments through the website called Google Classroom. It was because the teacher tried to keep giving feedback although they had to do the online teaching and process in order to make the students understand about their mistakes on their writings. Then, the results of the interview with the students revealed that high and medium achieving students stated that WCF from their teacher were beneficial for them in order to avoid the same mistakes in the future while low achieving student tended did not pay attention to the feedback given, therefore low achieving student did not get the benefit of the feedback itself.
    URI
    http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/103973
    Collections
    • MT-Linguistic [66]

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    UPA-TIK Copyright © 2024  Library University of Jember
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

    Indonesia DSpace Group :

    University of Jember Repository
    IPB University Scientific Repository
    UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository