Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/109433
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEFENDI, A’an-
dc.contributor.authorSUSANTI, Dyah Ochtorina-
dc.contributor.authorSARI, Nuzulia Kumala-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T06:00:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T06:00:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-30-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/109433-
dc.description.abstractAgricultural biotechnology legislation is not based on globally agreed international legal principles for the protection of public health and the environment from the risks of using agricultural biotechnology. The renewal of agricultural biotechnology legislation based on international law refers to parts of international law related to the economic use of agricultural biotechnology, aspects of trade in agricultural biotechnology products, and aspects of environmental protection and public health from the use of agricultural biotechnology. This study sets out three formulations of the problem: (1) why the renewal of legislation on agricultural biotechnology must be based on international law?; (2) what are the principles of international law as a source of renewal of legislation on agricultural biotechnology?; and (3) how is the implementation of international legal principles in agricultural biotechnology legislation? In this research using the type of normative legal research with a statute legal approach and a conceptual approach, three answers were obtained. First, international law is material for updating agricultural biotechnology legislation because of its strong influence on developing national law both now and in the future. Second, the principle of international law as a source of renewal of agricultural biotechnology legislation includes the principle of state sovereignty, the principle of prevention, the principle of prudence, the principle of polluters paying, the principle of cooperation, the principle of equal responsibility with different obligations, the principle of sustainable development, and the principle of participation public. Third, the implementation of the principles of international law is not carried out comprehensively but sporadically and is placed in the chapter on the principles, objectives, and scope of the law in question, not formulated in the form of a norm that has the legal force to be implemented. Relevant international legal principles must be applied comprehensively in a normalized manner in agricultural biotechnology laws that they have normative power to be complied with and implemented, not only placed in one chapter on the principles, objectives, and scope of law governing agriculture biotechnologyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJurnal Kertha Patrikaen_US
dc.subjectLegal reformen_US
dc.subjectagricultural biotechnologyen_US
dc.subjectinternational lawen_US
dc.titleThe Development of International Law on Agricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:LSP-Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.