| dc.description.abstract | The analysis begins with collecting and deciphering events that imply the
rigidity of Constance’s family. At this point, this research finds out two main
events; the first event shows Samuel Lumb as the Representation of Victorian
Middle Class Father while the second event exposes social class issues within
Constance’s family. Furthermore, this research also sees that Armitage uses
Constance as a symbol of freedom and the character of Constance uses to confront
the rigidity of her family. Then, the research observes the social background of
Aileen Armitage as the author. The phenomenon of crisis of England in 1970s and
the personal experiences of the author give an influence toward the creation of A
Dark Moon Raging. Thus, this research can draw a conclusion that Aileen
Armitage uses her novel as a form of critique to the rigid ideology of Victorian
middle class family in managing the family.
This research is qualitative research which concerns on exploring the data
that is non-numeric through the detail as depth as possible. Data used in this thesis
are in the form of words as it involves explanation, interpretation, and exploration
without calculation. The relation between the novel and the actual condition of
middle class family in Victorian era leads this research to reveal the Aileen
Armitage’s intention in adapting the real murder case of Constance Kent into a
novel entitled A Dark Moon Raging. The condition of Victorian middle class
family is represented in Constance’s family. The rigidity of Constance’s family is
regarded as the main factor which influences Constance in killing her half-brother.
The problem that occurred within Constance’s family as a result of rigid ideology
of middle class parents has made the children feels ignored. Therefore, it indicates
that Aileen Armitage as the author tries to convey an opinion that people should
not blame Constance but her family who has failed in bringing a good condition
and providing love and care to their children. | en_US |
