dc.description.abstract | The prediction on issuing going concern opinion has been major concern for
auditor or shareholders. Today, auditor responsibility is winding, not only in judging
the financial report or detecting a fraud, but also they have to judge the company
ability to maintain company going concern. That happens because there is demand
from the shareholders to give the early warning information about company prospect
that influence the investing decision of the shareholder. The goals of this research are
to predicting the influence of opinion prior year, Public Accountant Office reputation
and leverage that exercise by the company with the chance of receiving going
concern audit opinion.
This research use Perbankan Company that listed in Indonesia Stock
Exchange (ISE) between 2004 to 2008 as the sample. Samples are obtained by sensus
method and obtained 75 observation data from 2004-2008. This research intended to
reveal the trend of issuing going concern audit opinion during normal and crisis year.
The method that been used to analyses the correlation between variable are logistic
regression method.
From the Result, can be concluded that opinion prior year and leverage have
the positive correlation to the receiving of going concern audit opinion. Even though
the coefficient are the same way with hypothesis, but significance level is above than
0,05. Public Accountant Office reputation indicate the difference way with hypothesis,
this thing could be happened because the company which use Public Accountant
Office non big four can make going concern audit opinion than Public Accountant
Office big four, company in other country more likely prefer Public Accountant
Office non Big Four to be their auditor to get good opinion in going concern. But
contrary in Indonesia, the things that happened are in opposite way. The other result
from this research is going concern audit opinion more often happen during normal
year (after crisis), this things can occur because of politics factor on that year (after
the year of 2000) not stabile that effect the economy of Indonesia. | en_US |