Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNAFIAH, Evi Hidayatun
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-06T07:45:06Z
dc.date.available2024-02-06T07:45:06Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-22
dc.identifier.nim192410101086en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/119872
dc.description.abstractThe Internet is one of the information technologies that has significantly influenced various aspects of human life. MTsN 8 Banyuwangi is one of the junior high schools that has provided internet access to support the education service process. The available internet network often faces challenges such as unstable and slow connections when used simultaneously. These issues arise from the high number of users with different internet needs in each room, without bandwidth restrictions for individual users. Considering these conditions, bandwidth management is needed to enhance the efficiency of the available internet network using the Simple Queue method with PCQ and Queue Tree with PCQ. Both methods will be compared to determine which one is better suited for implementing bandwidth management at MTsN 8 Banyuwangi. The comparison of the two methods is conducted by calculating Quality of Service (QoS) values for several parameters, namely throughput, delay, jitter, and packet loss. Testing these parameter values uses the Wireshark application and manual calculations to obtain QoS values in accordance with TIPHON standards. The results of this research indicate that the Queue Tree method with PCQ has better performance in simulating bandwidth management on the internet network at MTsN 8 Banyuwangi compared to the Simple Queue method with PCQ. The throughput deviation value in the Queue Tree method with PCQ is lower by 356.2302 compared to the Simple Queue method with PCQ, which is 566,7029. Furthermore, other QoS parameters such as packet loss, delay, and jitter also show better results in the Queue Tree method with PCQ, with values of 0.39%, 6.46 ms, and 6.46 ms, respectively. In comparison, the Simple Queue method with PCQ has higher QoS parameter values, namely 0.45%, 6.94 ms, and 6.94 ms.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipYanuar Nurdiansyah, ST., M.Cs. Mohammad Zarkasi, S.Kom., M.Komen_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.publisherFakultas Ilmu Komputeren_US
dc.subjectSimple Queueen_US
dc.subjectQueue Treeen_US
dc.subjectPer Connection Queue (PCQ)en_US
dc.subjectBandwidth Managementen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Perbandingan Metode Simple Queue dengan PCQ dan Queue Tree dengan PCQ dalam Manajemen Bandwidth (Studi Kasus: MTsN 8 Banyuwangi)en_US
dc.typeSkripsien_US
dc.identifier.prodiSistem Informasien_US
dc.identifier.pembimbing1Yanuar Nurdiansyah, ST., M.Cs.en_US
dc.identifier.pembimbing2Mohammad Zarkasi, S.Kom., M.Komen_US
dc.identifier.validatorTeddyen_US
dc.identifier.finalizationTeddyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record