| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to examine the legal certainty of the PPAT's
authority in making deeds outside the area of his domicile. PPAT
in carrying out its functions and authorities is limited by the
working area, as regulated in PP PPAT in Article 12 paragraph
(1) that the PPAT working area is "one working area of the
Regency/Municipal Land Office". But then it was changed to one
province area.” Based on the article, it is clear that the PPAT's
work area has expanded, which was originally in the
district/municipality area, now it is in the province. Legal issues
studied 1). What is the basis for the amendment to Article 12
paragraph 1 of PP Number 24 of 2016 regarding the PPAT work
area? 2). How is the legal certainty of the authority of the PPAT
who makes the deed outside the domicile? The results of the study
indicate that the expansion of the PPAT working area arrangement
into one province as stipulated in Article 12 (1) PP No. 24 of 2016
caused problems due to the absence of implementing regulations.
And when there is legal certainty about the authority of PPAT after
the issuance of PP 24/2016, there is no implementing regulation in
this case a Ministerial Regulation which is expected to be a
guideline for PPAT in carrying out its authority. Suggestions in
this study are for the government to review PP No. 24 of 2016 with
the aim of maximizing the implementation of the rules by PPAT
officials. | en_US |
