Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.unej.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/76338
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSUNDARI, Siti-
dc.contributor.advisorSUKMANTARA, I Putu-
dc.contributor.authorMARDIARTO, Wahyu-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-11T02:15:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-11T02:15:04Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-11-
dc.identifier.nimNIM080210401053-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/76338-
dc.description.abstractThis classroom action research was conducted in two cycles (Cycle 1 and Cycle 2) and consisted of four activities which are planning of the action, the implementation of the action, classroom observation and evaluation, analyzing the data and reflection. The primary data of vocabulary achievement was obtained by conducting vocabulary test and classroom observation. The analysis should prove that at least 75% of the students got ≥70. The supporting data was collected on October 25th, 2011. The subject of the research was VIII-B students of SMPN 1 Maron Probolinggo. The vocabulary test in Cycle 1 revealed 14 or 46.66% of 30 students achieved ≥ 70. The result failed the target because it only reached 46.66%, which was remotely under 75% of the subjects getting ≥70. The observation was conducted based on the following points of indicators: 1) Paying attention to the teacher explanation, 2) Answering teacher’s oral questions, 3) Using dictionary to look up the unrecognized meaning of words, and 4) Completing the crossword puzzle. In the first meeting of Cycle 1, the result of class observation demonstrated that as many as 18 or 60.00% of 30 students were merely active in participating the process of teaching and learning. Furthermore, the second meeting of Cycle 1 showed statistically that 22 or 73.33% of the students were actively participating. The average number of active students in Cycle 1 was 66.65%. This did not even show a successful attempt in the cycle. Consequently, based on the result, Cycle 1 underwent several revisions to prepare Cycle 2 which were: 1. The teacher gave more exercises to broaden the students’ vocabulary skill. 2. The teacher presented more explanation regarding the crossword puzzle more clearly. 3. The use of bilingual (English and Indonesian) during the process of teaching and learning. This was attempted to provide more ease to the students to understand the explanation and instruction. 4. The teacher gave more time to work on the exercises. 5. The teacher assigned all the students to bring their own dictionary for the next meetings in Cycle 2. 6. The students were given questions when they did not pay attention. Based on the result of vocabulary test in Cycle 2, there was seen an improvement from 14 or 46.66% of 30 students in cycle 1 to 24 or 80.00% of 30 students in Cycle 2 who achieve ≥70. As for the observation, there was found 23 or 76.66% of 30 students were active during the first meeting and the number elevated to 24 or 80.00% in the second meeting. The average number of active students in Cycle 2 was 78.33%. Based on the result of the research, it could be concluded that teaching vocabulary by using the crossword puzzle was able to further enhance the students’ ability to improve their vocabulary skill and active participation.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries080210401053;-
dc.subjectVocabulary Achievementen_US
dc.subjectCrossword Puzzleen_US
dc.titleIMPROVING THE VIII-B STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BY USING THE CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT SMP NEGERI 1 MARON PROBOLINGGO IN THE 2013/2014 ACADEMIC YEARen_US
dc.typeUndergraduat Thesisen_US
Appears in Collections:UT-Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wahyu Mardiarto - 080210401053 -1.pdf2.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Admin Tools